In Re Harris

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In Re Harris

1922 OK CR 122, 208 P. 1118, 21 Okla. Crim. 382, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 279

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 23, 1922

DocketNo. A-4296.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 122 (In Re Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Harris, 1922 OK CR 122, 208 P. 1118, 21 Okla. Crim. 382, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 279 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The- petitioner, A. J. Harris, represents that be is restrained of his liberty and is unlawfully imprisoned in tbe county jail of Le Flore county by John Hunt, *383 sheriff of said county. It is further alleged in substance that said sheriff holds said petitioner under a commitment isuued by P. H. G-reen, justice of the peace in and for the city of Poteau district, after an examining trial wherein petitioner was held to answer for the crime of rape. It is further averred that petitioner is not guilty of the crime of rape as charged, and that the proof of his guilt is not evident, nor the presumption great. It is further alleged that, on an application for bail before the district court of said county, bail was denied. Upon a consideration of all the evidence, we are of opinion that bail should be allowed in this case, and bail is fixed in the sum of $10,000; said bond to be conditioned as by law provided, to be approved by the court clerk of Le Flore county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The- petitioner, A. J. Harris, represents that be is restrained of his liberty and is unlawfully imprisoned in tbe county jail of Le Flore county by John Hunt, *383 sheriff of said county. It is further alleged in substance that said sheriff holds said petitioner under a commitment isuued by P. H. G-reen, justice of the peace in and for the city of Poteau district, after an examining trial wherein petitioner was held to answer for the crime of rape. It is further averred that petitioner is not guilty of the crime of rape as charged, and that the proof of his guilt is not evident, nor the presumption great. It is further alleged that, on an application for bail before the district court of said county, bail was denied. Upon a consideration of all the evidence, we are of opinion that bail should be allowed in this case, and bail is fixed in the sum of $10,000; said bond to be conditioned as by law provided, to be approved by the court clerk of Le Flore county.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 122, 208 P. 1118, 21 Okla. Crim. 382, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harris-oklacrimapp-1922.