In re Harris
11 F. Cas. 611, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 105, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234
Opinion
None of the specifications filed by the Leather Manufacturers’ National Bank are sustained by the proofs, nor is any ground shown for withholding a discharge. A discharge will, therefore, be granted whenever the register shall certify conformity.
[A motion to set aside the proceedings in the Eastern district of New York was denied in Case No. 6,111.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Harris, 11 F. Cas. 611, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 105, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234 (S.D.N.Y. 1868).
11 F. Cas. 611 (In re Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.