In re Harris
This text of 667 F. App'x 420 (In re Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael F. Harris petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order instructing the district court to grant summary judgment on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion due to the Government’s delay in filing its answer. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court entered an order denying the § 2255 motion on May 10, 2016, and Harris has appealed that order. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Harris’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harris-ca4-2016.