In re Harrington
This text of 106 N.W. 851 (In re Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe petitioner seeks to assail tbe constitutionality of our recent statutes authorizing tbe indeterminate sentence and tbe transfer of prisoners upon tbe order of the board of control. He waives discussion of tbe constitutionality of the portion of those statutes authorizing an indeterminate [242]*242sentence, in deference to In re Schuster, 82 Wis. 610, 52 N. W. 757, bolding that snob question would be reviewable upon writ of error to tbe conviction and sentence and, therefore, is not upon writ of habeas corpus. He, however, seeks consideration of tbe question whether tbe authority given to the board of control is a conferring of judicial power, which, by the constitution, is confined to courts. This subject is fully considered and decided in In re Linden, 112 Wis. 523, 88 N. W. 645, which is decisive against the contention of the petitioner.
By the Court. — The petitioner is remanded to the custody of the warden of the state prison, to be held as before the writ issued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 N.W. 851, 127 Wis. 241, 1906 Wisc. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harrington-wis-1906.