In re Harrington

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Harrington

365 A.2d 539, 134 Vt. 610, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 763

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedFebruary 24, 1976

DocketNo. 21-76

StatusPublished

This text of 365 A.2d 539 (In re Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Harrington, 365 A.2d 539, 134 Vt. 610, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 763 (Vt. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

It having been brought to the attention of this Court by motion of the petitioner that recorded testimony taken below in this matter has been destroyed, it is ordered that:

(1) Both parties are granted leave to file the affidavits of all witnesses whose recorded- testimony was destroyed;

(2) By agreement of the parties, the testimony of Frederic W. Allen, Esq. may be filed by affidavit;

(3) The record will consist of all matters presented below including the report and findings of fact of the bar panel, the existing tapes, the transcribed testimony, any exhibits, plus the aforesaid affidavits;

(4) The petitioner’s application for readmission and the full récord is remanded to the Professional Conduct Board for review of. the report and record and for filing of its own recommendations and findings with this Court, together with the record in accordance with -the provisions of Rule XVII(d) of Administrative Order No. 30.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It having been brought to the attention of this Court by motion of the petitioner that recorded testimony taken below in this matter has been destroyed, it is ordered that:

(1) Both parties are granted leave to file the affidavits of all witnesses whose recorded- testimony was destroyed;

(2) By agreement of the parties, the testimony of Frederic W. Allen, Esq. may be filed by affidavit;

(3) The record will consist of all matters presented below including the report and findings of fact of the bar panel, the existing tapes, the transcribed testimony, any exhibits, plus the aforesaid affidavits;

(4) The petitioner’s application for readmission and the full récord is remanded to the Professional Conduct Board for review of. the report and record and for filing of its own recommendations and findings with this Court, together with the record in accordance with -the provisions of Rule XVII(d) of Administrative Order No. 30.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 A.2d 539, 134 Vt. 610, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harrington-vt-1976.