In Re Harper

690 S.E.2d 775, 387 S.C. 20, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 30
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 2, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on November 4, 2009, for a period of ninety (90) days, retroactive to March 31, 2009. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

COSTA M. PLEICONES, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

s/ Daniel E. Shearouse

Clerk

TOAL, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Harper, 690 S.E.2d 775, 387 S.C. 20, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 30 (S.C. 2010).

690 S.E.2d 775 (In Re Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Givens
690 S.E.2d 775 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)