In re Harper

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Harper

957 So. 2d 136, 2007 La. LEXIS 1323, 2007 WL 1574911

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 1, 2007

DocketNo. 2007-B-0888

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 957 So. 2d 136 (In re Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Harper, 957 So. 2d 136, 2007 La. LEXIS 1323, 2007 WL 1574911 (La. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with his clients, and failed to deposit an advance fee into his client trust account. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Billy Rex Harper, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 18613, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall enroll in and attend one full day of Ethics School offered by the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Practice Assistance and Improvement Committee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent will voluntarily participate in the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Fee Dispute Resolution Program regarding fees charged to Frederick Bogan.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI