In re Harper

999 N.E.2d 415, 2013 WL 6823392, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 988
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 19, 2013
DocketNo. 49S00-1310-DI-697
StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 415 (In re Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Harper, 999 N.E.2d 415, 2013 WL 6823392, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 988 (Ind. 2013).

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER SUSPENDING RESPONDENT FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW DUE TO DISABILITY

BRENT E. DICKSON, Chief Justice.

Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 25, on October 24, 2013, the Disciplinary Commission filed a "Verified Petition to Determine Disability," requesting this Court to suspend Respondent from the practice of law in this state due to disability. Respondent filed an "Affidavit of Consent to Disability Suspension" on November 6, 2013. On November 14, 2013, the Commission filed an "Unopposed Motion to Vacate Appoint ment of the Hearing Officer, and Motion to Suspend Gordon Lee Harper's License to Practice Law."

Being duly advised, the Court GRANTS the Commission's petition and motion and ORDERS that Respondent be hereby suspended from the practice of law in this state, effective immediately, due to disability, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28(25). Respondent shall fulfill all the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). Respondent may petition for reinstatement upon termination of the disability pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(4) and (18). The hearing officer appointment in this case is hereby vacated.

The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the hearing officer, to the parties or their respective attorneys, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 28(8)(d). The Clerk is further directed to post this order to the Court's website, and Thomson Reuters is directed to publish a copy of this order in the bound volumes of this Court's decisions.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 N.E.2d 415, 2013 WL 6823392, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harper-ind-2013.