In re Harper

852 N.E.2d 926, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 732, 2006 WL 2466962
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 18, 2006
DocketNo. 49S00-0606-DI-225
StatusPublished

This text of 852 N.E.2d 926 (In re Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Harper, 852 N.E.2d 926, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 732, 2006 WL 2466962 (Ind. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER OF SUSPENSION UPON NOTICE OF GUILTY FINDING

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11.1(a), files a Notice of Guilty [927]*927Finding and Request for Suspension, asking that the respondent, Paul Richard Harper, Jr.. be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state, pending further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, due to respondent being found guilty of a crime punishable as a felony.

And this Court, being duly advised and upon careful consideration of all materials submitted now finds that the respondent has been found guilty of a crime punishable as a felony, to wit: Operating a Motor Vehicle While Intoxicated. Accordingly, we find that the Commission's request for the respondent's suspension from the practice of law upon notice of guilty finding should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the respondent, Paul Richard Harper, Jr., is suspended pendente lite from the practice of law in this state, effective immediately. The suspension shall continue until further order of this Court.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order by certified or registered mail to the respondent or his attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities pursuant to the provisions of Ad-mis.Disc.R. 28, Section (8)(d), and to post this Order on the Court's website for orders concerning attorney disciplinary cases.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 N.E.2d 926, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 732, 2006 WL 2466962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harper-ind-2006.