In re Harp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Harp

181 A.D.2d 941, 581 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3871

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D.2d 941 (In re Harp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Harp, 181 A.D.2d 941, 581 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 3, 1991, respondent was suspended by this court for a period of six months, effective June 3, 1991 (see, Matter of Harp, 173 AD2d 957). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s reinstatement. Accordingly, respondent will be reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Levine, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent be and hereby is reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 3, 1991, respondent was suspended by this court for a period of six months, effective June 3, 1991 (see, Matter of Harp, 173 AD2d 957). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s reinstatement. Accordingly, respondent will be reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Levine, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent be and hereby is reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 941, 581 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harp-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack