in Re: Haroon Rasheed, Solar Health P.A., HRMD Management LLC, Texas Pain Physicians and Integrated Hospital Specialists

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 20, 2019
• Docket: 05-19-01556-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed December 20, 2019

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01556-CV

IN RE HAROON RASHEED, SOLAR HEALTH P.A., HRMD MANAGEMENT LLC, TEXAS PAIN PHYSICIANS AND INTEGRATED HOSPITAL SPECIALISTS, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04492

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Schenck, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Reichek Before the Court is relators’ December 19, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to

vacate the trial court’s order granting a continuance on relators’ no-evidence motion for summary

judgment.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show both that a trial judge has clearly

abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,

148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the

mandamus record, as well as the response, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled

to the relief requested. 2

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)

(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE 191556F.P06

–2–