in Re Harold S. Bowens, Jr.
This text of in Re Harold S. Bowens, Jr. (in Re Harold S. Bowens, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 28, 2014
No. 04-14-00598-CR
IN RE Harold S. BOWENS Jr.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
On August 21, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has determined that it lacks jurisdiction to consider relator’s petition. Accordingly, relator’s petition is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
The clerk of this court is ORDERED to forward a copy of relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and all accompanying attachments filed in this original proceeding to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
It is so ORDERED on August 28th, 2014.
_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of August, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1985CR3726, styled The State of Texas v. Harold Bowens, pending in the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Melisa Skinner presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Harold S. Bowens, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harold-s-bowens-jr-texapp-2014.