In re Harold Brazil
This text of In re Harold Brazil (In re Harold Brazil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
No. 18-BS-3
IN RE HAROLD E. BRAZIL 2016 DDN 136 et al. A Disbarred Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Bar Registration No. 190124
BEFORE: Glickman and Thompson, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior Judge.
ORDER (FILED – March 22, 2018)
On further consideration of this court’s January 18, 2018, order that disbarred respondent by consent, effective January 22, 2018, respondent’s motion to withdraw his consent to disbarment, the opposition of Disciplinary Counsel and reply thereto, and the motion of Disciplinary Counsel to file attachments 14 and 16 to his opposition under seal, it is
ORDERED the motion of Disciplinary Counsel to file attachments 14 and 16 under seal is granted and the Clerk shall seal these attachments. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s motion to withdraw his consent to disbarment is denied.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Harold Brazil, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harold-brazil-dc-2018.