in Re Harold Bowens
This text of in Re Harold Bowens (in Re Harold Bowens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00427-CR
IN RE Harold BOWENS
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 7, 2013
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED AS MOOT
On July 8, 2013, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial
court’s failure to rule on his “Motion Nunc Pro Tunc to Correct Judgment and Sentence.”
However, on July 15, 2013, the trial court signed an order denying relator’s motion. Accordingly,
the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1985CR3726W, styled The State of Texas v. Harold Bowens, pending in the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Melisa Skinner presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Harold Bowens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harold-bowens-texapp-2013.