In re Harnisch
144 A.D.2d 302, 534 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12633
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1988·Published
Opinion
Pro se motion for reinstatement as attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York granted only insofar as to refer application to Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department to hear and report, as indicated. Concur — Ross, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Harnisch, 144 A.D.2d 302, 534 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
144 A.D.2d 302 (In re Harnisch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.