In re Harmanek

Appellate Court of Illinois

In re Harmanek

66 Ill. App. 593, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 753

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 19, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Questions not easy of solution are suggested, but not presented, by this record. The appellee applied to the County Court to be discharged from arrest on a oa. sa. issued by a justice, and was there victorious.

The creditors appealed to the Circuit Court, the case was there tried by a jury, and the result was the same.

The Circuit Court had no jurisdiction of that appeal; it should have been to this court. Huntington v. Metzger, 51 Ill. App. 222; not reversed as to this point in 158 Ill. 272.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the appeal to that court. Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Questions not easy of solution are suggested, but not presented, by this record. The appellee applied to the County Court to be discharged from arrest on a oa. sa. issued by a justice, and was there victorious.

The creditors appealed to the Circuit Court, the case was there tried by a jury, and the result was the same.

The Circuit Court had no jurisdiction of that appeal; it should have been to this court. Huntington v. Metzger, 51 Ill. App. 222; not reversed as to this point in 158 Ill. 272.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the appeal to that court. Reversed and remanded with directions.

In re Harmanek, 66 Ill. App. 593, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 753 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

66 Ill. App. 593 (In re Harmanek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related