in Re: Harlingen Medical Center
Opinion
____________________________________________________________
Relator, Harlingen Medical Center, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in denying relator's "Motion to Compel the Return of Privileged Documents." The Court requested and received a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real parties in interest. The Court has further received relators' reply to the response.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, response, and reply thereto is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
6th day of January, 2010.
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Harlingen Medical Center (in Re: Harlingen Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.