In re Harley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Harley

987 A.2d 617, 201 N.J. 121

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 17, 2010·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-116, concluding that THOMAS A. HARLEY of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a)(1) (practicing law while ineligible to do so), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS A. HARLEY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-116, concluding that THOMAS A. HARLEY of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a)(1) (practicing law while ineligible to do so), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS A. HARLEY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Harley, 987 A.2d 617, 201 N.J. 121 (N.J. 2010).

Pincite

987 A.2d 617 (In re Harley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.