In re Harkins

116 Cal. App. 769
California Court of Appeal·Decided September 19, 1931·No. Crim. No. 1644·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

it is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal. App. 368 [205 Pac. 72], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal. App. 21 [297 Pac. 566].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Harkins, 116 Cal. App. 769 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

116 Cal. App. 769 (In re Harkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brune v. Superior Court
297 P. 566 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
In Re Rasmusssen
205 P. 72 (California Court of Appeal, 1922)