In Re Hardy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Hardy

949 A.2d 207, 195 N.J. 183, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 783

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 12, 2008·No. D-156 September Term 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-414, concluding pursuant to Rule that ROLAND G. HARDY, JR., of WOODBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(a) (engaging in business transaction with client without complying with safeguards of rule), RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of trust funds), and RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROLAND G. HARDY, JR. is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-414, concluding pursuant to Rule that ROLAND G. HARDY, JR., of WOODBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(a) (engaging in business transaction with client without complying with safeguards of rule), RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of trust funds), and RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROLAND G. HARDY, JR. is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In Re Hardy, 949 A.2d 207, 195 N.J. 183, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 783 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

949 A.2d 207 (In Re Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related