In re Hardy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Hardy

90 So. 3d 1043, 2012 WL 2549830, 2012 La. LEXIS 1926

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 22, 2012

DocketNo. 2012-B-1164

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 So. 3d 1043 (In re Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hardy, 90 So. 3d 1043, 2012 WL 2549830, 2012 La. LEXIS 1926 (La. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

*

LThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into [1044]*1044allegations that respondent engaged in professional misconduct, including his failure to refund unearned fees. Respondent failed to cooperate with the ODC in its investigation. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Gregory Paul Hardy, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22414, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of eighteen months. Prior to filing an application for reinstatement following his suspension, respondent shall comply with the conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI