In Re Happy Child World, Inc.
This text of In Re Happy Child World, Inc. (In Re Happy Child World, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN RE HAPPY CHILD § No. 25, 2021 WORLD, INC. § § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § Consol. C.A. No. 3402 VCS
Submitted: March 26, 2021 Decided: April 14, 2021
Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to
the Court that:
(1) On January 25, 2021, Boraam Tanyous filed a pro se notice of appeal
on behalf of Happy Child World, Inc. from the Court of Chancery’s post-trial
opinion and order resolving consolidated breach of fiduciary duty and appraisal
actions.1 The Chief Deputy Clerk directed Tanyous to have counsel enter an
appearance on behalf of Happy Child World by February 19, 2021 or a notice to
show cause would issue. On February 19, 2021, Tanyous requested an extension
until March 12, 2021 to find counsel, which the Court granted.
(2) After counsel failed to enter an appearance by March 12, 2021, the
Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing Tanyous to show cause why this appeal
1 In re Happy Child World, Inc., 2020 WL 5793156 (Del. Ch. Sept. 29, 2020). should not be dismissed for his failure to have counsel enter an appearance on behalf
of Happy Child World. In response to the notice to show cause, Tanyous lists the
Delaware attorneys he unsuccessfully contacted and argues the merits of the appeal.
(3) We conclude that this appeal must be dismissed. “In Delaware, a
corporation can act before a court only though an agent duly licensed to practice
law.”2 This Court “may not entertain an appeal by a corporation where the
corporation is not represented by counsel.”3 No counsel has entered an appearance
on behalf of Happy Child World in this appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),
that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice
2 Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc., 2009 WL 189862, at *1 (Del. Jan. 12, 2009). 3 Evergreen Waste Servs. v. Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd., 2011 WL 2601600, at *1 (Del. June 30, 2011). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Happy Child World, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-happy-child-world-inc-del-2021.