In Re Happe

916 N.E.2d 663, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 1417, 2009 WL 3837207
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 16, 2009
Docket82S00-0704-DI-169
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 916 N.E.2d 663 (In Re Happe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Happe, 916 N.E.2d 663, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 1417, 2009 WL 3837207 (Ind. 2009).

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND CONCLUDING PROCEEDING

Respondent has tendered to this Court a resignation from the bar of this State, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(17).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the resignation from the bar of this State tendered by Respondent is accepted effective immediately. The Clerk of this Court is directed to strike Respondent's name from the Roll of Attorneys. Respondent shall fulfill all the applicable duties under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any attorney disciplinary proceedings pending against Respondent are hereby dismissed as moot because of Respondent's resignation from the bar of this State.

Respondent shall be ineligible to petition for reinstatement to the practice of law for five years from the date of this order. See Admis. Disc. R. 28(4)(a). A petition for reinstatement is discretionary and requires clear and convincing evidence of the petitioner's remorse, rehabilitation, and fitness to practice law. See Admis. Disc. R. 283(4)(b).

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Spielman
916 N.E.2d 663 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
916 N.E.2d 663, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 1417, 2009 WL 3837207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-happe-ind-2009.