In re Hanson
This text of 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 329 (In re Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is quite apparent from the survey that the required number of consents within the prohibited distance has not been secured. Even could the respondent’s erroneous claim of measurements be accepted, it would still remain that several of the improperly acknowledged consents necessary to make the requisite two-thirds have been obtained by fraud and misrepresentation and must, therefore,0 be disregarded. . The misstatements were willful and of material facts and compel a revocation of the certificate. (Kessler v. Cashin, L. J., June 11, 1900.) The application is granted as of the date of the filing of the petition. (Lyman v. Monahan, 28 Misc. 408, 48 App. Div. 275.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Liquor Tax Rep. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hanson-nysupct-1900.