In re Hanselmann

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Hanselmann

858 A.2d 586

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 24, 2004

DocketNo. 931 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 858 A.2d 586 (In re Hanselmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hanselmann, 858 A.2d 586 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 28, 2004, pursuant to Rule [587]*587214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Fredrick C. Hanselmann to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Fredrick C. Hanselmann is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 28, 2004, pursuant to Rule [587]*587214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Fredrick C. Hanselmann to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Fredrick C. Hanselmann is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

858 A.2d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hanselmann-pa-2004.