In re Hannah A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hannah A.

84 A.D.3d 951, 921 N.Y.S.2d 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 84 A.D.3d 951 (In re Hannah A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hannah A., 84 A.D.3d 951, 921 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffmann, J.), dated August 12, 2010, which, upon a fact-finding hearing, determined that he neglected the subject children.

[952]*952Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence supports the Family Court’s determination that the father neglected the subject children by engaging in certain acts of domestic violence against the mother in their presence that impaired, or created an imminent danger of impairing, their physical, emotional, or mental conditions (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Matter of Jordan E., 57 AD3d 539, 540 [2008]; Matter of Andrew Y., 44 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2007]; Matter of Zachery M., 306 AD2d 348, 349 [2003]; cf. Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 367-372 [2004]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffmann, J.), dated August 12, 2010, which, upon a fact-finding hearing, determined that he neglected the subject children.

[952]*952Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence supports the Family Court’s determination that the father neglected the subject children by engaging in certain acts of domestic violence against the mother in their presence that impaired, or created an imminent danger of impairing, their physical, emotional, or mental conditions (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Matter of Jordan E., 57 AD3d 539, 540 [2008]; Matter of Andrew Y., 44 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2007]; Matter of Zachery M., 306 AD2d 348, 349 [2003]; cf. Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 367-372 [2004]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.3d 951, 921 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hannah-a-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack