In re Hanna
105 F. 587, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38
Opinion
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
I agree with, the referee in holding that the order in question operated as an equitable assignment of part of the fund, and that the trustee in bankruptcy of the assignor took the fund subject to the assignment. The transaction was valid between the bankrupt and the blower company, even if for reasons of public policy it could not be enforced against the city of Philadelphia.
The decision of the referee is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Hanna, 105 F. 587, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38 (E.D. Pa. 1900).
105 F. 587 (In re Hanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gadd v. Dawson
291 F. 327 (Eighth Circuit, 1923)
In re Hawley Down Draft Furnace Co.
256 F. 555 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1919)
In re Sherwoods, Inc.
210 F. 754 (Second Circuit, 1913)
What Cheer Savings Bank v. Mowery
128 N.W. 7 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1910)