In re Handfuss

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Handfuss

761 A.2d 537, 165 N.J. 569, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1709

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 22, 2000·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT J. HANDFUSS of MATA-WAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

[570] It is ORDERED that ROBERT J. HANDFUSS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT J. HANDFUSS of MATA-WAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

[570] It is ORDERED that ROBERT J. HANDFUSS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Handfuss, 761 A.2d 537, 165 N.J. 569, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1709 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

761 A.2d 537 (In re Handfuss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.