In re Handell

W.D. Texas

In re Handell

11 F. Cas. 420, 15 Nat. Bank. Reg. 71, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Texas

DecidedJuly 1, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 F. Cas. 420 (In re Handell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Handell, 11 F. Cas. 420, 15 Nat. Bank. Reg. 71, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148 (W.D. Tex. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

DUVAL. District Judge.

The above report of Mr. Register Newton and all the papers connected with the claim of Messrs. Good & Coombes, attorneys, etc., against the estate of Richard Handell, bankrupt, having been considered by' me. I concur in the opinion of the register, that under the law the said claim cannot be regarded ns having priority over the creditors, and while it is just and meritorious, it can only be paid pro rata with others.

The opinion of the register is affirmed and approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUVAL. District Judge.

The above report of Mr. Register Newton and all the papers connected with the claim of Messrs. Good & Coombes, attorneys, etc., against the estate of Richard Handell, bankrupt, having been considered by' me. I concur in the opinion of the register, that under the law the said claim cannot be regarded ns having priority over the creditors, and while it is just and meritorious, it can only be paid pro rata with others.

The opinion of the register is affirmed and approved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. Cas. 420, 15 Nat. Bank. Reg. 71, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-handell-txwd-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack