In re Handell
11 F. Cas. 420, 15 Nat. Bank. Reg. 71, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148
Opinion
The above report of Mr. Register Newton and all the papers connected with the claim of Messrs. Good & Coombes, attorneys, etc., against the estate of Richard Handell, bankrupt, having been considered by' me. I concur in the opinion of the register, that under the law the said claim cannot be regarded ns having priority over the creditors, and while it is just and meritorious, it can only be paid pro rata with others.
The opinion of the register is affirmed and approved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Handell, 11 F. Cas. 420, 15 Nat. Bank. Reg. 71, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148 (W.D. Tex. 1876).
11 F. Cas. 420 (In re Handell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Derby v. Worcester County
102 F. 808 (First Circuit, 1900)