In re Hanahuli Ass'n
This text of 532 P.2d 397 (In re Hanahuli Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The land court properly held that the relevant seaward boundaries of appellee Hanahuli’s land under dispute are located at the intersection of the shore and the upper reaches of the wash of the waves.
The phrase “highwater mark at seashore” used in Hanahuli’s applications’ description and in the land court’s decrees should, of course, be understood to refer to the upper reaches of the wash of the waves. County of Hawaii v. Sotomura, 55 Haw. 176, 517 P.2d 57 (1973), In re Application of Ashford, 50 Haw. 314, 440 P.2d 76 (1968).
We affirm the judgments of the land court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
532 P.2d 397, 56 Haw. 160, 1975 Haw. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hanahuli-assn-haw-1975.