in Re: Hamu Tuke Ulla
This text of in Re: Hamu Tuke Ulla (in Re: Hamu Tuke Ulla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 2, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-01090-CV
IN RE HAMU TUKE ULLA, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On November 16, 2004, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator obtained a default judgment in his divorce, but the trial court granted Relator=s wife=s bill of review. Relator seeks to vacate the trial court=s grant of the bill of review.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Moreno, 4 S.W.3d 278, 281 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 2, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Edelman, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Hamu Tuke Ulla, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hamu-tuke-ulla-texapp-2004.