In re Hammond

E.D. New York

In re Hammond

163 F. 548, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 283

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York

DecidedMay 29, 1908

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 163 F. 548 (In re Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hammond, 163 F. 548, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 283 (E.D.N.Y. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

Several demurrers to the petition in bankruptcy have been interposed. The first objection urged under the demurrer is that the bankrupts are alleged in the petition to have executed a bill of sale of their premises for a nominal consideration within four months of the bankruptcy, and that at the time of filing the petition the bankrupt's were insolvent. Any allegation of insolvency at the time of making the bill of sale was omitted. Under section 3 of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 546 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3422]) such an allegation was necessary.

The next ground of objection is that the petition states that judgments were suffered to be entered against the bankrupts, but does not state that they were not vacated within five days before a sale or final disposition.

The third ground of objection is that preferential payments are alleged to- have been made, but no particular payments are recited, and no allegation is made that any transfer of property referred to was with intent to prefer the creditors to whom the property was transferred.

Each of these grounds of demurrer is good in the sense that the objection is as to a jurisdictional fact which must be established in order to keep the estate in bankruptcy, but, inasmuch as other creditors’ rights have accrued, and inasmuch as the petition was dated upon the 9th day of April, whereas the transfer in question was made upon the 4th of April, in order to secure a past indebtedness, and as the petition contains the general statement that preferential payments have been made to creditors while the alleged bankrupts were insolvent, this would seem to be a proper case for amendment of the petition rather than for absolute dismissal.

The demurrer will be sustained on all three grounds, with leave to the petitioning creditors within five days to file an amended petition showing specifically the acts upon which bankruptcy is claimed and the conditions under which said acts were committed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

Several demurrers to the petition in bankruptcy have been interposed. The first objection urged under the demurrer is that the bankrupts are alleged in the petition to have executed a bill of sale of their premises for a nominal consideration within four months of the bankruptcy, and that at the time of filing the petition the bankrupt's were insolvent. Any allegation of insolvency at the time of making the bill of sale was omitted. Under section 3 of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 546 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3422]) such an allegation was necessary.

The next ground of objection is that the petition states that judgments were suffered to be entered against the bankrupts, but does not state that they were not vacated within five days before a sale or final disposition.

The third ground of objection is that preferential payments are alleged to- have been made, but no particular payments are recited, and no allegation is made that any transfer of property referred to was with intent to prefer the creditors to whom the property was transferred.

Each of these grounds of demurrer is good in the sense that the objection is as to a jurisdictional fact which must be established in order to keep the estate in bankruptcy, but, inasmuch as other creditors’ rights have accrued, and inasmuch as the petition was dated upon the 9th day of April, whereas the transfer in question was made upon the 4th of April, in order to secure a past indebtedness, and as the petition contains the general statement that preferential payments have been made to creditors while the alleged bankrupts were insolvent, this would seem to be a proper case for amendment of the petition rather than for absolute dismissal.

The demurrer will be sustained on all three grounds, with leave to the petitioning creditors within five days to file an amended petition showing specifically the acts upon which bankruptcy is claimed and the conditions under which said acts were committed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 F. 548, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hammond-nyed-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack