In re Hammond

9 F. Supp. 628, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1250
United States District Court for the District of Arkansas·Decided November 22, 1934·No. No. 3697·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HOPKINS, District Judge.

The above-named bankrupt, W. H. Hammond, having filed his petition for discharge, and said petition having been referred to Frank B. Bristow, one of the referees in bankruptcy of this court, to hear and report upon said petition, and said referee having filed his report showing that after due notice to all parties he held a hearing upon said petition and said report recommending that said petition for discharge be denied, for the reason that said W. H. Hammond has been granted a discharge in bankruptcy by this court within less than six years from this date, and-no exceptions having been filed to said report, and it appearing that said report [630] should be confirmed and, said petition denied, now, therefore, after due consideration, it is ordered that said report be, and it hereby is, confirmed and the petition of said W. H. Hammond for his discharge be, and it hereby is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hammond, 9 F. Supp. 628, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1250 (ard 1934).

9 F. Supp. 628 (In re Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Chester Housing Authority (In Re Johnson)
250 B.R. 521 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2000)
In Re Blanchette
54 B.R. 890 (D. Rhode Island, 1985)