In re Hammer

730 S.E.2d 856, 398 S.C. 593, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 220
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 22, 2012·No. Appellate Case No.2012-212290·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby enjoined from access to any trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts) respondent may maintain.

Within five (5) days of the date of this order respondent shall provide a sworn statement advising the Court whether [594] he has been retained by any clients and/or has obtained any client funds since his reinstatement on June 1, 2012.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hammer, 730 S.E.2d 856, 398 S.C. 593, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 220 (S.C. 2012).

730 S.E.2d 856 (In re Hammer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Howard B. Hammer
784 S.E.2d 678 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2016)