In re Hamlin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Hamlin

92 A.3d 670, 217 N.J. 620, 2014 WL 2883459, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 605

DecidedJune 19, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.3d 670 (In re Hamlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hamlin, 92 A.3d 670, 217 N.J. 620, 2014 WL 2883459, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 605 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-309, concluding that the ethics complaint filed against RAYMOND L. HAMLIN of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the complaint against RAYMOND L. HAMLIN in District Docket No. VA-2011-0028E, is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-309, concluding that the ethics complaint filed against RAYMOND L. HAMLIN of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the complaint against RAYMOND L. HAMLIN in District Docket No. VA-2011-0028E, is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.3d 670, 217 N.J. 620, 2014 WL 2883459, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hamlin-nj-2014.