In re Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hamilton

16 A.D.2d 950, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9293

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 950 (In re Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hamilton, 16 A.D.2d 950, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioner to confirm Official Referee’s report finding respondent guilty of the charges and recommending that he be suspended for one year. Motion granted and report confirmed, except as to the degree of discipline recommended. In our opinion, the respondent’s misconduct requires that he be suspended for a period for 2 years. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law for 2 years, commencing 30 days after entry of the order thereon. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner to confirm Official Referee’s report finding respondent guilty of the charges and recommending that he be suspended for one year. Motion granted and report confirmed, except as to the degree of discipline recommended. In our opinion, the respondent’s misconduct requires that he be suspended for a period for 2 years. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law for 2 years, commencing 30 days after entry of the order thereon. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 950, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hamilton-nyappdiv-1962.