In re Hamer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Hamer

517 S.E.2d 429, 335 S.C. 355, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 107

DecidedJune 4, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 517 S.E.2d 429 (In re Hamer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hamer, 517 S.E.2d 429, 335 S.C. 355, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 107 (S.C. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rules 16 and 17 of the Rules for Judicial Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 502, SCACR, because she has been indicted on numerous federal offenses and because she poses a threat of serious harm to the public or the administration of justice.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is placed on interim suspension until further order of this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rules 16 and 17 of the Rules for Judicial Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 502, SCACR, because she has been indicted on numerous federal offenses and because she poses a threat of serious harm to the public or the administration of justice.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is placed on interim suspension until further order of this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

517 S.E.2d 429, 335 S.C. 355, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hamer-sc-1999.