In Re Halsey

Federal Circuit

In Re Halsey

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 13, 2012

Docket2011-1435

StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re Halsey (In Re Halsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Halsey, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE EUGENE HALSEY, IV AND CATHERINE A. GETZ

. ____________________

2011-1435 (Serial No. 10/744,522)

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

GOKALP BAYRAMOGLU, Law Office of Gokalp Bayramoglu, of Holland, Michigan, argued for appellant.

LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and BENJAMIN D.M. WOOD, Associate Solicitor.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI