In re Hall

32 N.Y.S. 883, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 201
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 5, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the city court

of Mt. Vernon, punishing Gilbert Hall for contempt of court. The contempt consisted in an interposition of a false answer in an action in that court in favor of Henry B. Jenkins and John Carmody against Gilbert Hall and Wright Hall (32 N. Y. Supp. ubi supra) The answer was false, and all the facts and circumstances show that Gilbert Hall knew it to be so. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hall, 32 N.Y.S. 883, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 201 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

32 N.Y.S. 883 (In re Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fromme v. Gray
36 N.Y.S. 1107 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)