In re Hall

New York Supreme Court

In re Hall

32 N.Y.S. 883, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 201

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 5, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 N.Y.S. 883 (In re Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hall, 32 N.Y.S. 883, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 201 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the city court

of Mt. Vernon, punishing Gilbert Hall for contempt of court. The contempt consisted in an interposition of a false answer in an action in that court in favor of Henry B. Jenkins and John Carmody against Gilbert Hall and Wright Hall (32 N. Y. Supp. ubi supra) The answer was false, and all the facts and circumstances show that Gilbert Hall knew it to be so. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the city court

of Mt. Vernon, punishing Gilbert Hall for contempt of court. The contempt consisted in an interposition of a false answer in an action in that court in favor of Henry B. Jenkins and John Carmody against Gilbert Hall and Wright Hall (32 N. Y. Supp. ubi supra) The answer was false, and all the facts and circumstances show that Gilbert Hall knew it to be so. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.Y.S. 883, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hall-nysupct-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack