In re Haley

N.D. Alabama

In re Haley

11 F. Cas. 194, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 36

DecidedJuly 1, 1868

StatusPublished

This text of 11 F. Cas. 194 (In re Haley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Haley, 11 F. Cas. 194, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 36 (N.D. Ala. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

BUSTEED, District Judge.

It appears that the creditor, Daniel Johnson, is a resident of the judicial district in which the proceedings are pending. Proof of his debt must be made before a register in bankruptcy exercising his functions within the district. The affidavit before United States Commissioner Price is not a compliance with the twenty-second section of the law of March 2d, 18CT. This section, in relation to its present matter, is mandatory. I agree with the conclusions arrived at by Register BURKE, and in the reasons he gives for these conclusions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUSTEED, District Judge.

It appears that the creditor, Daniel Johnson, is a resident of the judicial district in which the proceedings are pending. Proof of his debt must be made before a register in bankruptcy exercising his functions within the district. The affidavit before United States Commissioner Price is not a compliance with the twenty-second section of the law of March 2d, 18CT. This section, in relation to its present matter, is mandatory. I agree with the conclusions arrived at by Register BURKE, and in the reasons he gives for these conclusions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. Cas. 194, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-haley-alnd-1868.