In re Halbran

30 Misc. 517, 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 247, 63 N.Y.S. 1026
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beekman, J.

This is a proceeding instituted under subdivision 2 of section 28 of the Liquor Tax Law for the cancellation of a liquor tax certificate on the ground that the property for which the certificate was issued was within 200 feet of a church edifice; that it was also within 200 feet of private houses occupied exclusively as private residences, and that the consents of two-thirds of the owners of the same had not been obtained; that the consent of the owner of the premises on which the traffic was to be conducted had not been duly secured, and that the answers to certain questions contained in the statement filed with the sub-commissioner of excise in this county when the application for the certificate was made were false. These allegations are all put in issue by the answer which has been filed by the respondent. . The usual course in such cases must, therefore, be followed, and the matter sent to a referee to take proof. The proceeding which had previously been instituted against the respondent by one .Clark with respect to the same matters abated by his death, and not having been revived, it in no way constitutes an objection to the maintenance of this proceeding, which has been brought by another person. The claim that the petition should be dismissed under the authority of Matter of Lyman, 160 N. Y. 96, is untenable, as is also the contention that the petition, is defective because of its failure to show that the petitioner is a taxpayer, for the reasons which I have stated in my' memorandum in the case of Matter of Halbran, ante, page 515.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Halbran, 30 Misc. 517, 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 247, 63 N.Y.S. 1026 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

30 Misc. 517 (In re Halbran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Lyman
59 A.D. 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)