in Re Haidar Barbouti
This text of in Re Haidar Barbouti (in Re Haidar Barbouti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Denied; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 14, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00243-CV
IN RE HAIDAR BARBOUTI, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 245th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020-40106
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 5, 2022, relator Haidar Barbouti filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Tristan Longino, presiding judge of the 245th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s March 29, 2022 temporary orders and reinstate the Agreed Order pending final orders in the modification suit. Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Haidar Barbouti, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-haidar-barbouti-texapp-2022.