In re Hahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hahn

131 A.D.2d 164, 520 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49513

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.2d 164 (In re Hahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hahn, 131 A.D.2d 164, 520 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Third Department, on December 10, 1969. Petitioner [165]*165commenced this proceeding to suspend respondent from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.23 (b) on the ground that he has become incapacitated because of mental infirmity. Respondent has not submitted an answer to the petition but has by letter indicated that he has no objection to the relief sought.

Based on the pleadings and the medical evidence submitted, we find that respondent is incapacitated from practicing law. Therefore, the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this court.

Dillon, J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Boomer, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.23.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI