In re: Hagwood v.

49 F. App'x 485
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2002·No. 02-7369·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Burton Hagwood petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court has denied Hagwood’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Hagwood’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Hagwood v., 49 F. App'x 485 (4th Cir. 2002).

49 F. App'x 485 (In re: Hagwood v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mack v. King
E.D. Michigan, 2023