In re Hafer
11 F. Cas. 152, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 547, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229
Opinion
As I un•derstand this case, all the separate property of each bankrupt has been allowed to him as exempted. The state exemption laws have been decided by the state courts not to apply to partnership property; and the words of the act of congress manifestly refer only to separate property of the debtor. The exceptions are overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Hafer, 11 F. Cas. 152, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 547, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229 (E.D. Pa. 1868).
11 F. Cas. 152 (In re Hafer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Beauchamp
101 F. 106 (D. Maryland, 1900)
In re Lentz
97 F. 486 (D. South Dakota, 1899)
In re Camp
91 F. 745 (N.D. Georgia, 1899)
Hart v. Hiatt
48 S.W. 1038 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1899)