In re Hafeesah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hafeesah

243 A.D.2d 255, 663 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9279

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 A.D.2d 255 (In re Hafeesah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hafeesah, 243 A.D.2d 255, 663 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Ruth Zuckerman, J.), [256]*256entered, on or about November 29, 1995, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, following a fact-finding determination that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, menacing in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and placed her with the Division for Youth, in a non-secure facility for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The officer’s inquiry as to the whereabouts of the knife, after having been apprised by the complainant and eyewitnesses that appellant had stabbed the complainant, did not constitute a custodial interrogation, but rather, a proper investigative inquiry at the scene of a crime (see, Matter of Kwok T., 43 NY2d 213; see also, New York v Quarles, 467 US 649). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Ruth Zuckerman, J.), [256]*256entered, on or about November 29, 1995, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, following a fact-finding determination that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, menacing in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and placed her with the Division for Youth, in a non-secure facility for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The officer’s inquiry as to the whereabouts of the knife, after having been apprised by the complainant and eyewitnesses that appellant had stabbed the complainant, did not constitute a custodial interrogation, but rather, a proper investigative inquiry at the scene of a crime (see, Matter of Kwok T., 43 NY2d 213; see also, New York v Quarles, 467 US 649). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Colabella, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D.2d 255, 663 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hafeesah-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack