In re Haddad

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Haddad

223 A.2d 473, 126 Vt. 85, 1966 Vt. LEXIS 167

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 4, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Elias F. Haddad, acting without .counsel, has moved that the judgment of disbarment against him, entered thirty-two years ago, be set aside. His petition attempts to refute the grounds on which the disbarment was granted, seeks to reopen the factual questions at issue, and attacks the honesty, integrity and good faith of the commissioners and the prosecutor.

The opinion of this Court in In re Haddad, 106 Vt. 322, 173 Atl. 103 laid these questions to rest. Even if all other prerequisites of such a motion were met, the time for any challenges to the finality of that adjudication have long since expired. The petition is dismissed as out of time.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Elias F. Haddad, acting without .counsel, has moved that the judgment of disbarment against him, entered thirty-two years ago, be set aside. His petition attempts to refute the grounds on which the disbarment was granted, seeks to reopen the factual questions at issue, and attacks the honesty, integrity and good faith of the commissioners and the prosecutor.

The opinion of this Court in In re Haddad, 106 Vt. 322, 173 Atl. 103 laid these questions to rest. Even if all other prerequisites of such a motion were met, the time for any challenges to the finality of that adjudication have long since expired. The petition is dismissed as out of time.

Petition dismissed.

In re Haddad, 223 A.2d 473, 126 Vt. 85, 1966 Vt. LEXIS 167 (Vt. 1966).

Pincite

223 A.2d 473 (In re Haddad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related