In re Hackney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Hackney

763 A.2d 357, 563 Pa. 528

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 30, 2000

DocketNo. 610 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 763 A.2d 357 (In re Hackney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hackney, 763 A.2d 357, 563 Pa. 528 (Pa. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2000, a Rule having been entered by this Court on August 30, 2000, pursuant to [529]*529Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing James V. Hackney, III, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; James V. Hackney, III, is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2000, a Rule having been entered by this Court on August 30, 2000, pursuant to [529]*529Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing James V. Hackney, III, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; James V. Hackney, III, is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 A.2d 357, 563 Pa. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hackney-pa-2000.