In Re Hable
This text of 55 B.R. 5 (In Re Hable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER VOIDING LIEN
Debtors Edward F. and Linda M. Hable, by Attorney Terrence J. Byrne, having filed an Application for Avoiding Lien, and the United States of America Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), by Attorney Sheree L. Gowey of the United States Attorney’s Office, having filed an Objection to said Application; and the matter being submitted on briefs; the Court, having considered the briefs submitted and the complete record and file herein, and being fully advised in the premises, FINDS THAT:
1. “The sole issue in this case is whether the debtors can avoid liens on tools of the trade in excess of the $750.00 limit under § 522(d)(6) by use of the ‘wild card’ exemption under 522(d)(5).” Letter Brief of FmHA (filed June 14, 1984).
2. This issue has been resolved by Judge Martin’s decision in Rameker v. Hollinsed (In re Hollinsed), 54 B.R. 155, (Bankr.W.D.Wis.1984).
CONCLUSION OF LAW
The Debtors may avoid the FmHA lien.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED THAT the security interest of the United States of America Farmers Home Administration is voided to the extent that it impairs a sec. 522(d) exemption to tools of the trade of the Debtors.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 B.R. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hable-wiwb-1984.