In re Haber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Haber

219 A.D.2d 4, 639 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3050

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D.2d 4 (In re Haber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Haber, 219 A.D.2d 4, 639 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on February 18, 1981 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he relocated to Massachusetts, where he was admitted to practice in 1982; that he is currently employed there; that he does not intend to return to New York State to practice law; and that he is resigning because he no [5]*5longer wishes to maintain his attorney registration in this State. There are no pending complaints against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on February 18, 1981 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he relocated to Massachusetts, where he was admitted to practice in 1982; that he is currently employed there; that he does not intend to return to New York State to practice law; and that he is resigning because he no [5]*5longer wishes to maintain his attorney registration in this State. There are no pending complaints against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 4, 639 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-haber-nyappdiv-1996.